Chasing Virality At The Expense Of Culture Is Doom
A country progresses when its institutions define rules and guidelines that govern its mandate; these regulations apply to all organizations. As the Telecel Ghana Music Awards (TGMA) approach, we are back to the same old cycle of debates regarding who truly deserves the crown; however, the reality remains that without ironclad, transparent criteria, we are just fighting in the dark. If the institutions themselves do not grasp their own objectives, how can they expect the culture to follow?
There is a massive distinction between a “Record of the Year”, a “Best New Artist”, and the “Most Popular Song”. Look at the “Hip Hop Artist of the Year” category and consider what we are actually measuring. Did the nominees architect a moment that shifted the sound, or did they catch a lucky break on the timeline? Popularity is a vital metric; it is the raw data of market sentiment, but it is not a genre standard. If we are serious about scaling the Ghanaian sound, we have to be explicit about the benchmarks of excellence we are rewarding.
Institutional guidelines are the blueprints for our future. We cannot afford to be rigid gatekeepers who block new sounds; nonetheless, we also cannot afford to subsidize trends in place of talent. We often hear about nostalgia bias, but the reason the “golden eras” felt better was that they were governed by structural rules that forced evolution. Today, global music is hitting a wall because platforms reward moments over movements. In Ghana, we talk a lot about taking our music to the world, but that requires a transparent meritocracy. A viral song is a firework, bright, loud, and gone in seconds; conversely, a genre-evolving record is a blueprint for the next ten years. We have to ask whether this artist is riding the wave or the tide. If you have a million views but zero influence on the sonic direction of the next generation, you are just a guest in the house, not a tenant. True status belongs to the architect.
“The public should be invited to crown the hits, but the Academy must remain a protected custodian of the heritage.”
The partnership between Charterhouse and Telecel is one of the engines that keeps the lights on. We must acknowledge that the 40% public vote, which acts as the financial pillar, is a commercial necessity; it provides the liquidity required to produce a show of this magnitude. Popularity is a valid entry point; it proves an artist has captured the zeitgeist and built a viable business. However, popularity is a poor final metric for cultural heritage. We must view the Popularity categories as the lead magnets that draw eyes to the ceremony, while the Technical categories serve as the closing products that deliver long-term value; one cannot exist without the other, but they must never be confused. A crisis occurs when the logic of the marketplace starts to supersede the logic of the craft. When the 60% Academy and Board, the cultural pillar, starts aligning itself with trending data just to avoid friction, the institution stops being a benchmark and starts being a ledger. To protect the prestige, we must quarantine popularity. Let the public crown the hits in dedicated commercial categories while keeping the technical genre awards under the protected custody of an objective Academy.
The current TGMA framework is a popularity-driven hybrid. Since the “Artiste of the Year” title should belong to the individual who pushed the music scene’s frontier forward, the current reliance on audience appeal risks turning a boundary-breaking milestone into a popularity contest. Even with the swing period policy, we are still honoring the result of fame rather than the process of innovation. While the Board handles technical categories like “Record of the Year”, the broader focus still looks too heavily swayed by the sheer volume of nominations. This prioritization of public identity over long-term sonic architecture makes the framework look like a local commercial tally rather than a regional authority. As TGMA 2026 rolls around, the lack of hype for genre-specific categories shows that artistic craft has become a footnote. When we equate an award of the year with being the most patronized, we fail to project our winners as global cultural elites.
“We are winning the sprint but losing the marathon.”
Scaling the culture means deconstructing how we measure success. We need a weighted system that represents the wisdom of the future. By bringing in genre-specific committees, such as historians, active producers, journalists, and curators who are actually in the trenches, we ensure a nomination is a validation of mastery rather than a traffic report. This is about Ghana’s global economic footprint. When we reward viral anomalies over genre evolution, we are exporting a hollow version of our culture that will not last. Global musical powerhouses have scaled because their entire ecosystems, labels, media, and award schemes eventually align on a standard of excellence. They understand that a genre is a brand that must be protected from dilution; consequently, if we keep crowning mediocrity at home, we cannot be surprised when our sound fails to translate into a global legacy. We are winning the sprint but losing the marathon.
The “Best” in any category has to be the one pushing the forefront of Ghanaian music outward. “Best New Artist” should go to someone whose narrative is strong enough to project us onto the global stage from day one. We cannot demand a seat at the top when our own governing bodies do not understand the assignment. We spend so much time chasing the Grammy, but we are not refining the prestige of our own house. We must stop pleading for a seat at the table and start refining the furniture at our own; establishing standard operating procedures, because if the furniture is good enough, the global guests will come to our table by default. Global projection is not the goal; it is the inevitable symptom of a well-run house. Prestige is commanded through a ruthless adherence to standards.
Every nominee should represent a niche we believe will help Ghana achieve a global position in the next five to ten years. It is time to restore our sound’s dominance. To be “Artiste of the Year” must mean you have pushed the needle, not just moved the numbers. To be clear, “pushing the needle” is not a subjective vibe; it is a measure of industrial influence, trackable by whether a winning sound creates a measurable trend of imitation among other artists in the following twelve months. If we demand excellence from our artists, we first demand integrity from the systems that crown them.
Follow @theimullar on Instagram and X(Twitter) for more.
